We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Tuesday, 11 March 14
HOLD HARMLESS CLAUSES ARE NOT ALWAYS MUTUAL! - ITIC
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
ITIC provides an insurance related contract review service to all of its members. As the leading professional indemnity insurer for the offshore and hydrographic sector, we are often asked to review contracts which contain a mutual hold harmless or knock for knock clause. We are usually told that the presence of this clause in a contract means the risk of a claim is either significantly reduced or even non-existent! No contract is completely risk free. However, if the clause is worded carefully, and is balanced between both contracting parties, it is good contractual risk management and can help to reduce the chance of a successful claim of negligence against you.
A mutual hold harmless indemnity regime provides that each party to the contract agrees to take responsibility for, and to indemnify the other, against injury and loss to its own personnel and property and its own ‘consequential losses’. This is intended to be effective even if the accident and related losses are caused by negligence.
The mutual hold harmless clause in the LOGIC standard form contracts, does seek to create balance. However, in many of the contracts we review, the party with the greater bargaining power will naturally seek to swing the balance back to their favour. Consequently, there are a number of pitfalls to consider. We shall provide a few of these below. This shall be viewed from an English law and a professional indemnity insurance perspective.
Insurance
First, when asked to review contracts with a mutual hold harmless clause, ITIC would suggest that your other insurers are notified. Potentially you are signing away the recovery rights of both your property and employers’ liability insurer. Therefore, you should seek authority from them before signing a contract containing a mutual hold harmless clause.
They may not be mutual
It is staggering how often we see contracts where “the consultant shall indemnify the company against any and all losses,” but there is no reciprocal benefit to the consultant. Furthermore, the clause can be more beneficial to one party, as one side may be carrying out all of the work, using only their employees and property. The clause should be read carefully to ensure there is a mutual provision.
Third party damage
The mutual hold harmless clauses seen by ITIC, although setting out the losses suffered to the property or employees of the contracting parties, will often leave the distribution of third party liabilities unclear. If, for example, you act as a hydrographic consultant on a survey vessel, you should be protected from third party claims arising from the operation of the vessel. The consultant should not be responsible for potentially multi-million dollar pollution liabilities, or collision damages to third party property. These should fall upon the party who has insurance for these liabilities, such as the vessel’s protection and indemnity or hull and machinery cover.
Gross Negligence
The hold harmless regime provides that neither party shall be liable to the other even where the loss occurred is due to the negligence of one party. However, in some cases we see the clause is amended to state this does not apply in instances of “gross” negligence. Therefore, if one of the parties is found to be grossly negligent they will not be held harmless. This might be fine if the contract was pursuant to Norwegian or US law.
Unfortunately, there is no true concept of gross negligence under English law. You should always operate under the assumption that you are negligent or you are not. Baron Rolfe, in - Wilson v Brett (1843) - stated that he “could see no difference between negligence and gross negligence; that it was the same thing, with the addition of a vituperative epithet.” In other words “gross” did not add anything to the standard negligence test. That being said, if gross negligence is included in a contract, a tribunal will attempt to interpret it. The leading decision comes from Lord Mance in - The Hellespont Ardent (1997) – in which he found that gross negligence: is “conduct so seriously negligent that the defendant should not be entitled to rely on the exemption clause.” He further added that it is “very much a matter of degree and judgment,” and, “all the circumstances must be weighed and balanced.” It should be pointed out that Lord Mance was interpreting a contract pursuant to New York law. Therefore, his words are not binding, and his interpretation on gross negligence may not be followed by subsequent tribunals.
The line between negligence and gross negligence can become blurred, and cases will turn on the facts and expert evidence. Moreover, tribunals may have differing opinions on how to apply the test against the facts, reaching differing decisions. On balance, the inclusion of gross negligence within a hold harmless clause in a contract pursuant to English law can lead to uncertainty and increased litigation costs.
Finally, it is understandable that contracting parties do not want the other to rely on a hold harmless clause, as a shield for reprehensible behaviour, beyond the ordinary test of negligence. However, as the line is blurred between that of negligence and gross negligence, a more delineated position to take, is between that of wilful default/misconduct and negligence.
Indirect damages
A further and final point we see, is how consequential or indirect losses are defined in the mutual hold harmless clause. It is usual that these losses are excluded under contract. However, the distinction between indirect and direct loss can be complicated. The famous case of Hadley v Baxendale [1854] found that direct losses were those which arise naturally from the breach of contract, and is therefore foreseeable and recoverable. Whereas, indirect losses were recoverable, but only if they were reasonably foreseeable by both parties, as a possible result of a breach, at the time of contracting.
A common misconception is that all “loss of profits” are indirect losses. This is wrong. Loss of profits can be either direct or indirect, depending on the facts of the case. The following is taken from the hold harmless clause of a contract we have reviewed recently:
“ The consultant nor the company shall be liable to the other… for any consequential indirect damage, that may be suffered by the other.”
This clause could pose problems in the event of a claim, as it only excludes “consequential indirect damages.” Following Hadley v Baxendale, dependant on the facts, loss of profit can either be a direct or indirect result of the breach. If, for example, a consultant was providing design work for sub-sea equipment and carried out the design negligently, not only could this cause damage to property, but also lost drilling time, leading to lost revenue and profit. In this example, a tribunal could find the loss of profit arose naturally from the breach, and therefore, is a direct loss not excluded under the above hold harmless clause. Taking into account the current day rates of drill rigs, this could form a substantial part of any claim.
The clause should be amended to state loss of profits are excluded, whether direct or indirect.
Conclusion
ITIC’s advice is that you carefully review your hold harmless clauses to ensure that they are actually mutual and of benefit to you.
Source: ITIC / Hellenic Shipping
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Friday, 06 September 24
REBOUND IN OIL DEMAND COULD LIFT MARKET IN LATTER HALF OF 2024 - BIMCO
Supply/demand
Based on a strong second half demand, the supply/balance is forecast to strengthen in 2024 but weaken slightly in 2025 as n ...
Friday, 06 September 24
GLOBAL SEABORNE LNG TRADE HAS CONTINUED TO INCREASE LAST YEAR - BANCHERO COSTA
Global seaborne LNG trade has continued to increase last year, helped also by the events in Ukraine which forced Europe to diversify away from Russ ...
Wednesday, 28 August 24
SEABORNE COAL IMPORTS INTO INDIA INCREASED BY +9.9% Y-O-Y TO 146.6 MLN T - BANCHERO COSTA
Global coal trade has really picked up pace over the past year, and is now fully back to pre-Covid levels said Banchero Costa Research in its lates ...
Tuesday, 06 August 24
EXERCISE CAUTION WITH AMMONIA SWITCH - BALTIC EXCHANGE
A new study from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) has thrown a spanner into the plan to transition ships from diesel fuel to ammonia ...
Friday, 02 August 24
ENERGY MARKET DEVELOPMENTS: COAL AND NATURAL GAS PRICES REACH RECORD HIGHS - WORLD BANK
The recent surge in natural gas and coal prices has been so swift that the main benchmarks were roughly three times higher in 2022Q2 compared to a ...
|
|
|
Showing 1 to 5 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Australian Coal Association
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- White Energy Company Limited
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- PTC India Limited - India
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- The University of Queensland
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Economic Council, Georgia
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Planning Commission, India
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Parliament of New Zealand
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
|
| |
| |
|
1 